Often, we go in with limited knowledge on how good is the external scoping team if at all. Which means, we have to evaluate them mid-session. Here's a couple advices on how to do the latter.
If you ever developed or wanted to develop an application of any kind, it’s rather probable that you have taken part in or at least heard about a scoping session of some sort. It wasn’t necessarily called that, but since different companies use different terminology, the idea stays the same. So...
In today’s article, I would like to share with you the most valuable insights from our experiences with re-writing native to React Native and help you decide whether your business would benefit from such a migration or whether it would be just a waste of time and money.
In the final instalment of our comparison of RN with other mobile technologies, we will compare React Native to its closest alternative: another JavaScript-based framework known as NativeScript.
I already compared React Native to native development in my last piece, so now let’s have a look at its next competitor — Ionic React.
Both React Native and native technologies have their pros and cons. Very often it makes more sense to pick React Native. The question is — when exactly?
Would you like to build a set of iOS and Android apps that share as much as 99% of their code? Doable with React Native. And quite frankly, there's even more benefits to using said framework. Read on.
Here comes the culmination of our series of blog posts about building an MVP. Let's go through the main steps involved in building an MVP product for you tech startup. Without any further waffle, let’s jump straight in.
Looking for something that requires the least amount of resources and time but can provide an important feedback while testing whether the market actually needs your product? The Fake Door MVP is what you need.
Developing an MVP can be valuable in many ways. Today I've gathered 6 of the most common benefits as well as provided a couple of use cases on how to utilize them.